Pssssssst. Shauna! If we wanted to see who's the best caterer with their hands tied, we'd watch this show. If we wanted to see who's the best food television personality, we'd watch this show. But we're watching your show. Can we get back to seeing up-and-coming chefs showing off their skill, style and creativity in an attempt to win seed money for their restaurant/catering dreams? Kaythanksbye.
In truth, my annoyance with this week's elimination challenge has waned with time. I'm still not entirely comfortable with Top Chef making forays into the realm of some... other... shows, but at least I can appreciate the logic. Yes, once casting has finished their job, the competition is about your food, not your ability to mug for the camera (I'm looking at you, Danny). But at least the challenge wasn't framed as a television star casting call, but rather as an exercise in the blunt reality of working in high profile restaurants these days. Like it or not, today's best chefs are celebrities, and even if they don't seek fame, fame will seek them. You don't have to have a Food Network show and a book deal and a line of signature cookware, but if you aspire to the heights of the profession, it's probably a good idea to learn to be comfortable cooking on camera. And though timing, personality and knowing your audience all figured into the mix, in the end the chefs had to make a good dish. A number of chefs didn't finish in time or embarrassed themselves on camera, but the ones who found themselves on the chopping block were those who made bad food.
Once again, though, I totally dug the quickfire, even if far too many of the cheftestants were unclear on the concept. "One bite" is the phrase that's tossed around a lot, but that's an overly simplistic and narrow definition, I think. Yes, small is important, but it's as much about refinement and excitement as it is about physical size. Amuse bouche is a fun little tease. It's the one time that it's okay to be overly precious. Amuse needs to be small, it needs to be highly refined, it needs to be beautiful, and its flavors need to absolutely pop. The chefs were presented with a real-world challenge that asked them to produce something they should understand and be able to execute, and by putting amuse bouche in an atypical context -- breakfast -- they were given another avenue to express their creativity. Once again, the quickfire tells us more about our chefs' core cheffing abilities than the elimination.
And yet, we're still left with a large pack of chefs who have made a splash here and there but failed to firmly establish themselves as favorites. Reading around the 'net, it seems that most people see this as an indictment of this season's contestants. I think most people have short memories. The general consensus is that Richard and Stephanie had established themselves as highly talented heavy favorites very early on last season, and that's not completely untrue, but I think time has exaggerated the memory. In the first three episodes, Richard had a couple of really interesting winners, but also had a chicken soup and paella that were strongly criticized. It wasn't until episode four that he really broke out, and then he immediately followed that with the sous vide salmon fiasco that put him on the chopping block. Stephanie, meanwhile, got that first win with the great looking duck dish, but Rocco savaged her pizza, she survived a lousy crab salad in episode two because she was lucky enough to be on a team with the only two chefs who performed worse than her, and her episode three win was for a fruit crumble. Meanwhile, Antonia, Dale and even Mark looked very strong in the early running. Point being, as easy as it is to say in hindsight that we all knew they'd be there at the end, and while many of us did, in fact, have them at or near the top of our lists, I don't think it was the obvious call at the time that so many remember it to be. Don't misunderstand, I'm not yet convinced that this season's latter stages will have the same kind of heavyweight bout vibe of last season's, but it's early. I say give this season a few more weeks to develop before deciding it's populated by a bunch of hacks. There's good stuff beneath the surface. The kids can play. We've yet to see their best.
And precisely because we've yet to see their best, no number one again this week. Digging through this pack is still tricky. Nobody's really broken free, and the fact that they've been kneecapped in half of the eliminations so far doesn't help, but we're eight dishes in and if you look at the complete body of what they've made so far, it's possible to get a sense of where they're coming from, even if they haven't made it crystal clear for us just yet. So with this week's rankings, I'm starting to shift away from the week-to-week horserace that typifies the first quarter of the season, and look a little more at the big picture. By no means are we throwing out last week's rankings or ignoring this week's results, but having just done a review of each chef's performance thus far, I'm bumping them a notch or two based on the impression I'm left with. Incidentally, I'm up against multiple deadlines, leaving for an important trip at the end of the week and the sickness has just descended upon me, so forgive me if I breeze through some of the less interesting cheftestants this week. I hope to be myself again next week.
The power rankings are not purely a prediction of who is most likely to win, or an assessment of last episode's dishes, or a reflection of the contestants' historical performance, but rather a nebulous amalgam of all three, combined with a little bit of gut feeling, to provide a relative measure of current awesomeness.
| 2 |
Leah |
|
Quickfires |
2
|
2
|
1
|
| Last Week: 4 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
2
|
0
|
She isn't doing much with the eliminations, but if she keeps winning quickfires I suppose she doesn't have to (for a while, anyway). Her fried quail egg with spicy tomato, bacon, parmesan and and fried sage was fairly straightforward but absolutely perfect from a technical and philosophical standpoint. She kept it compact and pretty. Working her herb in as a fried crisp on top made for both a great presentation and a textural contrast that might've been lost in a larger dish but pops in a single bite. And where Jamie used a slice of fresh tomato, Leah cooked tomato down until almost dry, intensifying the flavor so that the tiny bite would carry more oomph. Decisions like these may seem small, but they aren't made lightly and they separate the good from the great. In comparing the first quarter of this season to last, what struck me as the biggest difference was that last season had featured a few more wow dishes at this point -- the creative dishes that display an unusual level of sophistication. And yet, Leah's turned out two or three that, in my estimation at least, seem to fit that category. Dishes like the farotta with snapper and the asparagus soup with tuna would fit right into the finals. Even her scallop and apple dish, though she arrived at it by being slow with the knife, looked interesting and well-executed. We don't know how her seared duck with corn, blueberries and citrus sauce was received since the judges seemed more concerned with her lack of presence on camera, but in the pure tests of culinary skill she's turning out some impressive dishes. There's no breakaway performance here and she's not without stumbles. I'm keeping number one in my back pocket. But she's won two quickfires in a row and she's turned out a couple of the most impressive dishes. In this field, that earns her the not-number-one-highest-available-spot.
|
| 3 |
Jamie |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
3
|
0
|
| Last Week: 2 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
2
|
1
|
Unlike most, I do think Jamie was in real danger this week. Yes, her error was small compared to Melissa and Alex, but eliminations on Top Chef always have a logic to them -- even if that logic isn't always consistent from episode to episode -- and I started to worry when I could see the logic behind which they could separate her from the other two. Melissa grossly overspiced and brought her palate and judgment into question by insisting there was nothing wrong with the result. Alex made a decision so far disconnected from reality that his dish was dead in the water before he even started cooking it. Jamie's sin, slightly underestimating the time she needed, seems minor in comparison, and it is, but it produced what I would consider the worst consequence. If the host of the show goes rushing for water you might not be invited back, but capsaicin junkies will be intrigued and the rest of the audience might even be amused. If your crème brûlée doesn't set, it still looks pretty and the host probably won't say anything. But if the host balks at eating an undercooked egg or -- god forbid -- brings up the S word, you could have a full blown PR problem. I don't mean to suggest it would be warranted. I'm in the camp that resents having to pull teeth to get a raw egg with my sukiyaki, much less the accompanying visual assessment of how likely I am to sue. But raw egg hysteria is widespread, and the argument that in a live television context Jamie's mistake was potentially the most disastrous is, I think, a fair one. I'm less inclined to lend any weight to the criticisms of her attitude. It seemed clear to me that she was upset only with herself, she stepped right up and calmly took her lumps like a grownup at Judges' Table, and while it doesn't excuse her performance, I doubt anybody honestly believes that's how she would have reacted if she were really doing a live demo rather than a staged one. In any case, I can't justify leaving somebody at the top after landing on the chopping block, but with the given that she survived, she racked up another near win and this particular elimination hasn't done anything to change my opinion of her performance or her prospects.
|
| 4 |
Stefan |
|
Quickfires |
1
|
2
|
1
|
| Last Week: 3 |
|
Eliminations |
1
|
1
|
0
|
Like just about everybody else in the top half, Stefan had a decent week but still hasn't gotten back to the expectations he set in the first episode. His amuse, the huevos rancheros served in the shell, was a perfect example of why amuse shouldn't be so narrowly defined as "one bite". Rocco had it absolutely right. It was more than one bite, but that was amuse in spirit. Like Leah, he went for intensity by going heavy on the yolk in his mix. The flavor profile wasn't anything special at all -- egg, cheddar, cream, salsa. But by poaching instead of scrambling and going with a beautiful presentation, he elevated it and made it special. And then he did a completely mundane minestrone (I smell a tactical decision not to do anything risky) and, apparently, didn't do much to sell it. But the reason I have him at number four isn't fading episode one glory. I still love what I've seen in some of his recipes. I see some neat ideas, nice pairings and interesting flavors in clean, well-articulated dishes. And even if we'd never seen episode one, I think I'd still feel that way. Incidentally, for all of those who want to run out and start topping eggs, it is a fun presentation, if a ton of work. For Iron Chef Egg, I did a spicy Asian egg salad trio that was served on little round toasts under eggshell caps (we tipped them slightly so you could see the food for the photo), and a souffle trio that I got to rise out of eggshells. Two dishes x three eggs x fifteen diners = 90 beheaded eggs. I gave up on the topper that Stefan used after about ten of them, and went to the sanding band on my Dremel. Worked shockingly well. It would sand through the shell while leaving the membrane intact, so I could then rinse away the eggshell powder before exposing the egg inside. I got perfectly smooth cuts in seconds and I got to cook with power tools. What's not to like?
|
| 5 |
Fabio |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
1
|
| Last Week: 6 |
|
Eliminations |
1
|
3
|
0
|
Am I the only one who rolled my eyes when Fabio expressed trepidation at this week's elimination? You could sit in front of the television blindfolded and still know that he's a natural for this. Fabio could be eliminated next week, and he would have already won Top Chef season five. If he wants it, he'll have his own show before the end of next year. But when it comes to actually winning the competition, I just can't put him any higher. He's made some smart moves and earned some praise, but I still haven't seen the kind of distinctive, sophisticated, confident dishes that he'll need to get past the middle part of the season. His amuse would have been fine if you like sweet breakfast and a milkshake (I don't). When it comes to the elimination, however, I greatly appreciate the need to stay simple, but there's simple fresh and interesting and there's simple boring. Sesame crusted tuna, roasted carrots and asparagus and balsamic reduction screams early '90s -- if not late '80s -- to me. Keep it simple, fine, but give it something. Just one little twist, one little unconventional ingredient, and you can make that dish fresh and interesting again. Maybe he's holding back, but as much as I like the guy -- he's impossible not to like -- he has yet to cook like a winner. He's had some success, he seems to be capable (atrocious plating aside) and my feeling is he'll probably be hanging around late, so I'm reluctantly putting him near the bottom of the top tier, but I do so with significant reservations.
|
| 6 |
Gene |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
0
|
| Last Week: 5 |
|
Eliminations |
1
|
2
|
0
|
If Gene had given me anything to go on at all this week, I would have left him above Fabio. Who knows? Maybe he did. But the editors didn't show us a thing. So to keep you abreast of what he's doing, his amuse was a one bit pork sausage and bacon sandwich on rye made with an over easy quail egg and bacon yamamomo vinaigrette. I'd like to know how the sausage, rye, egg and fruit blended, but even more, I'd like to know where the hell he got yamamomo. Yamamomo, or mountain peach (yama = mountain and momo = peach in Japanese), is a funky little stone fruit from China and Japan that looks kind of like a large, spherical raspberry and it has a really pleasant, clean sweet flavor. But while I've gotten them in American restaurants and I don't doubt they're obtainable by the general public, I don't think I've ever seen one in a store in the States. And in any case, it was a quickfire, so he couldn't have shopped for it. There's no way that's part of the TC pantry, and despite a lot of freeze framing, I couldn't spy them on the breakfast table. Did he bring some along? Can you buy canned yamamomo? Anyway, his elimination dish looks nice and I thought it was a pretty good choice. He did a tuna sashimi with snow pea shoot salad and daikon vinaigrette. It wasn't overly complicated, anybody can do it, but between the ingredients and spooning sizzling oil over the raw fish, it had some wow factor for your average viewer. Perhaps the judges thought it too complicated, or perhaps he just wasn't quite as strong as the top three. Or maybe they were also concerned about the fact that he didn't seem to know the difference between sushi and sashimi. Here's hoping he was just frazzled by the clock and couldn't get the answer out. In any case, with Gene, he's showing creativity, he's articulating a style, he's met with some success, and I think the questions with him is one of finesse. A lot of his dishes look kind of heavy handed, which could get old quickly. We'll see.
|
| 7 |
Jeff |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 9 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
1
|
I've been looking for an excuse to bump Jeff up, and making Kathie Lee's head explode seems as good as any. The fact that his sumac spiced malfouf roll with muhamara sauce put him on top pretty much blows the theory that Gene didn't make top three because his recipe was too complicated. There's a lot of stuff going on in that recipe, and I'd love to see how he got through the demo. This only further bolsters my impression that the guy is fast fast fast. Which doesn't help him unless he's also good, but it's interesting. It's hard to see what Kathie Lee found so offensive in that recipe, but it wasn't just a matter of spice, as some have suggested. When Ariane did her demo on Thursday morning, Jeff's dish came up, and Kathie Lee used the word "putrid" to describe it. No matter how fast and charming Jeff may have been during his demo, I can't believe the TC judges would have put him on top if his dish didn't also taste good, so I guess that tells us something about Kathie Lee's palate that I'm sure surprises exactly nobody. His loaded potato and yogurt sorbet with fruit skewer amuse looked fine, but man, this guy has got to learn to do less. You get the impression that it might finally be sinking in, and I just have this feeling that he's going to start to shine when it does. We'll see what he does next week.
|
| 8 |
Radhika |
|
Quickfires |
1
|
1
|
1
|
| Last Week: 7 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
0
|
Radhika also received scant coverage this week, and what little coverage she did receive was to cover the fact that Rocco didn't cover her dish. Thanks, guys. That was a valuable use of screen time. She nailed size and presentation with her amuse, making a little potato cake with a marble-sized plain jane omelet with hollandaise. I'm thinking it lacked pop. Her elimination dish, on the other hand, certainly wasn't lacking for pop. Her sweet heat shrimp calls for a cup of garlic chili sauce, two cups of sweet chili sauce and curry powder. It looks like a bit of a mish mash, but I'm not comfortable passing judgment without tasting. Too bad she didn't finish on time, or we might have learned something about it. In any case, mostly due to a lack of information, I'm letting her tread water.
|
| 9 |
Hosea |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
2
|
0
|
| Last Week: 8 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
1
|
Ditto Hosea, for whom we got even less feedback than Radhika. His amuse was a sweet potato hash with fried quail egg, curried bacon, spinach and maple syrup. I can see that all working right up until I hit the maple syrup, which gives me pause, so I wonder if that's why we didn't hear more about it. His elimination dish was a crispy ahi roll with spicy ginger dipping sauce, which combined wasabi and sriracha and strikes me as muddy pseudo-Asian. Not that I have a problem with pseudo-Asian, but it tends to get overly busy and sweet and I suspect that's what happened here. Though I do like the idea of using crushed wasabi peas for texture. Anyway, as with Radhika, I'm going to punt on Hosea this week.
|
| 10 |
Ariane |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 13 |
|
Eliminations |
2
|
2
|
2
|
She's won half of the elimination challenges on my scoreboard, but I can't put her higher than ten. You'd think this means I have something against the lady, but I swear, I don't. I kinda like her, actually. And unlike some, I'm not going to knock her salad. Yeah, it was taking the easy way out, but what's wrong with that? It was a smart move. Maybe not quite as smart as it seemed, since she didn't know she'd be cooking for the Today Show's fourth hour gaggle until after the fact, but still, simple, easily obtainable local product, tasty and a combination of flavors that, even if it's obvious to food nerds, is going to strike your average viewer as kind of interesting. Her cream cheese and bacon stuffed french toast with chile syrup even got a little nod from Rocco. So why can't I bring myself to put her any higher? I think it's because when she's winning, she's doing so by cooking turkey in a toaster oven and making a really, really simple salad -- skills that will be meaningless by the midpoint of the season. Meanwhile, what she's screwing up are the kind of fundamental cooking skills that she can't survive for long without. He failures speak more to me than her successes. And while the little bit of confidence she's managed to muster these past two weeks may very well allow her to flourish going forward, I'm not kicking her up until I see it. I don't care what the scoreboard says.
|
| 11 |
Carla |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 10 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
0
|
Add Carla to the list of people with a non-episode. Her amuse was just a small version of pancakes with fruit and strawberry syrup. She needed to either elevate it technically or creatively to stand out, and she did neither. One gets the impression she thought, "Hey, silver dollar pancakes are small," and then stopped thinking. The judges said her elimination dish tasted fine, but she didn't finish, and it was Tex Mex tortilla soup. She's not screwing up, and her flavors seem to be solid, and that will probably carry her for a little while. And again, it's nothing personal. I know she's rubbing some people the wrong way, but she seems like a sweetheart and while I'm not down with grand pronouncements about spirits and the universe, she's got a quirky kind of charm. But strictly from a competitive standpoint, while many are saying she deserves more respect than she's receiving, I just don't see what I'm supposed to be getting excited about. Competence in preparing pedestrian dishes?
|
| 12 |
Danny |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
1
|
| Last Week: 14 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
1
|
Apparently Tex Wasabi is alive and well and on the set of Top Chef. I could almost get behind Danny's oafish but enthusiastic charm... right up until he pointed at the camera and said Baba Booey. While I've pretty much lost interest in watching him, I give him credit for knowing what he wants and not being afraid to admit it. That said, I'm sorry, Danny. The role of breakout personality this season has already been taken. The reason Danny's so close to the bottom was perfectly encapsulated in his amuse. Zucchini blossoms stuffed with bacon, potato, garlic and mushrooms and breaded and fried with corn flakes? Seriously, Danny? Zucchini blossoms are a delicacy, and a delicate one at that. I'm all for high brow / low brow fusion, but it has to actually work. I don't know how you can even taste a zucchini blossom with all of that going on, much less determine how it matches up. The reason Danny's not all the way in the basement, however, is perfectly encapsulated in his elimination dish. There's no recipe posted, but he did a ginger sweet soy marinated skirt steak with cabbage salad, and Padma, at least, seemed to like it. So even if he made an ass of himself and set off every smoke detector in the building in the process of making it, he seems to possess the ability to stumble his way through an edible dish every now and again...
|
| 13 |
Melissa |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Last Week: 12 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
1
|
...which is more than we can say for Melissa, who removed her magical cloak of Top Chef invisibility only to make a completely inedible dish and narrowly avoid elimination. There was absolutely a case for her elimination as well, and a lot of people -- Lee Anne included -- think she should have been the one to go. And it wasn't just a matter of too much heat or Tom's narrow palate (an accusation, BTW, that I think has been vastly overblown). Rocco called it inedible. Padma all but called it inedible. And Lee Anne pointed out that not only was it unfathomably hot (seriously... she blew out the entire panel), but that it was completely lacking acid and salt. Like Rocco, Lee Anne is convinced she's lying and there's no way she tasted her dish, or if she did, she has no tastebuds whatsoever. I think the judges would have liked to eliminate Melissa. The problem was that while she gave them a terrible dish to taste...
|
| 14 |
Alex |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
0
|
| Last Week: 11 |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
1
|
...Alex didn't give them a dish at all. There's been a lot of muttering around the boards -- others didn't even finish making their dishes, so why were Melissa and Jamie, who completed problematic ones, put on the block when it seems all they would have had to do was say, "Oops! Couldn't finish in time!" to save their skins? The answer is that as part of the demo, everybody had a completed plate ready to swap out for tasting. Everybody, that is, except for Alex. For starters, this decision to make crème brûlée was absurd. We're not talking about underestimating the time you're going to need by a little. We're not talking about underestimating the time you're going to need by a lot. We're talking about a full-blown disconnect with reality. Unless you have a 30 foot long scarf, travel around in a flying police box and can alter the laws of time and space at your whim, you don't make a slow braised dish for a 15 minute quickfire, and you don't make crème brûlée when you have one hour. So not only was it not set properly due to a completely baffling choice, but Lee Anne points out that he forgot to take it out of the freezer, so he didn't even have a completed dish for the judges to taste. They were left with the little bit of hot custard he had at the demo table. How do you let that slide? And what was the incredible creative inspiration that got him so fired up he couldn't even tell the difference between one hour and four? Adding a little bit of rose water to a plain crème brûlée. Woo. Alex seemed like a really sweet fellow. And, good for him, he apparently has a new BFF waiting for him in the sequester house and a beautiful bride waiting for him back home. Maybe the anticipation of seeing both was simply too much for him. Whatever the reason, Alex's head clearly wasn't in this competition.
|
EPISODE FIVE SPOILERS AHEAD!!!
Huzzah! It's time for the culinary bee! With a twist! The chefs are paired? Any guesses? I'm stumped. Will one try to fool the other? Will they taste each other's dishes and attempt to identify the ingredients? It can't be the latter... I have no idea how you'd standardize that across pairs so that you could declare a winner. If we were at eight or sixteen remaining chefs, I might think playoff brackets. But I'm looking for thoughts, because I have no clue what they're planning. Or, you know, I could just wait two days and find out.
As for the elimination, it looks like we get a real honest-to-god straight up cooking elimination again, even if it's a team effort. The chefs cook for Gail's wedding shower, and do four courses based on the old "Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue" line. I've seen some complaints that we're getting another catering challenge, but it doesn't look like the group is THAT big to me. The chefs are working out of a real kitchen and the numbers look manageable, so in practice I think this is going to end up looking more like a large dinner party than a catered event. In any case, we even know the teams from the preview. I'm thinking Stefan, Jeff and Hosea doing something old look like the ones to beat. I might have put Leah, Fabio and Melissa up there, but they're being asked to do a blue dessert? That pretty much saddles them with blueberry, right? I suppose they could interpret it a little more broadly and do something with bleu cheese. In any case, that draw is looking like a severe handicap. I'm sure they'll pull through, but I'm not pegging them for the top. On the other end, I'm thinking Carla, Danny and Gene doing something new looks like the team that could be in trouble. Of course, the always misleading preview leads us to believe that Ariane has some serious problem cooking lamb, and we all know how much Top chef judges loooooove lamb that isn't cooked properly. So for the win, given that he’ll have a teammate with a strong personality who knows restraint and can reign him in a bit, I’m putting my money on respected team leader and prep beast Jeff. If that teams wins, I could also see it going to Stefan who, with his catering experience, could come out looking like the hero. I'm thinking it'll come down to whoever's fingerprints are on their dish concept. And I'm going to say that we lose either Carla or Danny this week, with an outside shot at ousting Ariane.
Here's hoping I'm healthy by Wednesday.