We're back!
Well, that wasn't the most enjoyable week. Thanks for not giving me a hard time, folks. Viral meningitis, while not its terrifying cousin bacterial meningitis, is still a nasty little condition. My ladylove's been in and out of the hospital since last Monday (mostly in), and though she's back home and on her way to kicking it, I understand people are sometimes hospitalized for a month. The lesson? Don't get viral meningitis. Y'know, in case you were considering it.
So at this point, I'm a little out of the loop. I've been watching, of course, but I'm not quite as on top of all of the supplemental information as I ordinarily am. Plus, with a two week gap, there isn't really any continuity in the rankings. So while I'm getting caught up, this edition will be a bit of a pause as we gear up for the second half of the season.
And frankly, now seems as good a time as any to address the season as a whole. Popular sentiment certainly seems to be that season seven is a clunker. I'll happily concede that it isn't a shining paragon of all that Top Chef can be, but I think that's a little harsh. These guys are mostly putting out good food, which is more than I can say for most of the field in a few seasons. I started thinking a couple of weeks ago that the problem may be rooted in the fact that so few of the contestants have easily distinguishable styles. Last season, perhaps even when we had as many as ten contestants left, you could look at their dishes blind and know whose was whose with a reasonable degree of accuracy. Now look at the dishes put out this week. Think you could do the same this season? It makes it harder to follow because the dishes all run together. Though it seems the food is generally very good, nobody's standing out, either in terms of quality or style.
Which got me thinking about how coming up with a good Top Chef cast is basically an impossible task. First off, we don't want to see people who can't cook, so they all have to be good. But not too good, or it doesn't feel like a competition between up-and-comers anymore. And other than a few throwaways, they need to all be of roughly equivalent skill level, or a couple will dominate and ruin any sense of suspense. They have to have personality or we're bored. But not too much personality. That's distracting. And a little negative is okay, but not too negative. Nobody wants to watch a bunch of nasty people. Unless there are also some really likeable people. Then we can get that good guy / bad guy thing going. And their styles have to be disparate, or we can't tell their dishes apart. Make sure they all have very different, easily definable styles. And we need to have an even gender split, and some level of diversity. And they have to be articulate on camera. And we need seventeen of them.
Got all that?
Seriously, I think it's a miracle most of these casts turn out as well as they do. No cast is perfect (well, you might be able to make a case for season four), so it becomes a question of strengths and weaknesses and which are more important to you. For me, the biggest one is the food, which is what made last season so much fun. Incredible talent, wild and recognizable styles. Makes for fun food TV. But many complained that four of them were just too good, and it took all of the suspense out of the bulk of the season. So what do we have this season? Parity.
And this is really what I'm holding onto as the thing that could make the second half of this season really interesting. Am I alone in thinking that this thing is totally up for grabs? The ones at the top have done well, but they aren't worldbeaters. The ones at the bottom have had a lot of problems, but even Amanda has turned out some really good food. And the middle of the pack... anybody care to put odds on who out of Andrea, Alex, Ed, Tiffany and Kevin make the finals, or should I set up the dartboard? There have been seasons where you could walk away from the show at this point, come back for the finals and make a pretty good guess as to who would be left. But unless the final four includes both Stephen and Amanda, is there really any final four that would completely shock you?
It also makes the rankings hell. Especially when I've been so out of touch for the past couple of weeks. But here goes.
The power rankings are not purely a prediction of who is most likely to win, or an assessment of last episode's dishes, or a reflection of the contestants' historical performance, but rather a nebulous amalgam of all three, combined with a little bit of gut feeling, to provide a relative measure of current awesomeness.
| 1 |
Angelo |
|
Quickfires |
2
|
4
|
0
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
1
|
2
|
0
|
Two weeks gone, and I only had to change one number in the stats for him. Everybody notice that since winning the first three challenges, Angelo hasn't won a thing? He has all of the hallmarks of a Top Chef winner -- technical skill, creativity, a definable style -- and despite a few minor gaffes, he's managed to completely stay out of trouble. So the top spot is still his. But it's not by the wide margin it once was. It'll be interesting to see if he regains that early dominance, or if some of the pack start to challenge him. And some of them are making some noise.
|
| 2 |
Kelly |
|
Quickfires |
1
|
2
|
2
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
2
|
2
|
0
|
Kelly, for example, who seems to be finding her footing, has strung together some nice looking dishes including a couple of winners, and I think has earned the second spot. What's more, though she went to the final round of the hotel elimination challenge, she's never been on the chopping block. Her dishes aren't always the flashiest or most distinctive, but they're creative and mostly well-executed, she's on a bit of a roll and I have a hunch she's going to come on even stronger moving towards the finals. A flameout's always possible, but right now I feel comfortable predicting her for the top four.
|
| 3 |
Kenny |
|
Quickfires |
2
|
5
|
0
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
1
|
2
|
3
|
Kenny gave up the number two position as much as Kelly seized it. He's been one of the most successful contestants, but unlike Kelly he's also had a nose for the chopping block. Had I been doing the rankings this whole time, I probably would have kept him in the number two spot until this week, where Kelly's win coupled with Kenny looking completely flabbergasted at Judges Table tipped the balance. I still think Kenny's going to pull it together and make the finals. He's the last of the three for whom I'm comfortable making that prediction. And his style is distinctive enough that I think he'll do well there and have a shot at the win. But his flameout quotient is higher than Kelly's and he's coming off a rough week, so down to number three he goes.
|
| 4 |
??? |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
0
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
0
|
No, Hubert Keller has not swooped in to join the Top Chef season seven field. And I don't mean to imply a huge break between the top three and the middle of the pack. It's just that no matter which of the MOTPers I put in the fourth slot, I don't feel good about it. Solution? Nobody's going there this week. It's up for grabs. Here's the thing. At this point, short of going with simple gut instinct, I think it's nearly impossible to find daylight between the next five contestants. They're different, but it's nearly impossible to say one is stronger than the others. You have two who have yo-yoed between the top and the bottom. You have two who, six episodes in, have still barely made a splash. And you have one whose reception has been pretty lukewarm except that he happened to bust out what seems to be one of the most beloved dishes of the entire competition thus far. In short, I pity the poor bastard who has to figure out how to sort out that mess... oh... right.
|
| 5 |
Kevin |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
2
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
1
|
3
|
2
|
And the winner of the pick who will give me indigestion this week is... Kevin! Here's the line of thinking. I'm putting those who have showed some fire -- even if it has also come with some failure -- ahead of those who are quietly plodding along. The Power Rankings are a measure of awesomeness, and while a legitimate strategy and potentially a great route to the finals, quietly surviving is less than awesome. Two weeks ago? No way this is Kevin. But he seems to be coming out of his funk, and this week he basically made a creative reimagining of Vitello Tonnato, which I only just identified as one of my all-time favorites. So the guy has good taste. And he's coming off a win. And that's good enough for me. But in all seriousness, the guy has made noise and his winners have been distinctive. And even though I would not be the least bit surprised to see him go down in flames tomorrow night, I'm going to put him here anyway. And before you chide, remember that somebody has to go here.
|
| 6 |
Andrea |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
2
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
1
|
2
|
0
|
Andrea is kind of like Kevin lite. Not in terms of cooking style, of course. I'm talking about record. Her results have that same up and down sine wave pattern, just with less frequency and amplitude. Fewer appearances top and bottom, and less triumphant or tragic. And while it'd be easy to simply say that's why she's here, the truth is that her recipes have a lot to do with it as well. Of the MOTPers, hers just strike me as a little more interesting and distinctive. So if everybody keeps performing as they are (not that I actually expect that to happen), she seems more likely to stand out than some of the other MOTPers.
|
| 7 |
Tiffany |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
3
|
0
|
In the little aggregate rankings you guys have been running (glad you're keeping busy in my absence, BTW), Tiffany seems to be ranking pretty high. I understand why. I have a good feeling about her too. But you want to know why I'm not putting her any higher? ... Quick, name one dish Tiffany's made other than this week's tuna and gazpacho! ... That's why. Okay, maybe a few of you thought of that sweet potato with chocolate sherbet. Can you name another? Exactly. Still, I like the cut of her jib. Though I wasn't around to go on record with it, I've thought for the past couple of weeks that she was due to make a move. And she started to this week. It won't take much more noise for me to shoot her right to the top of the MOTP. We'll see what happens.
|
| 8 |
Ed |
|
Quickfires |
1
|
2
|
1
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
1
|
Ed was a little up and down the first few episodes, but since then he's been much like Tiffany, which is to say quiet as a mouse. Except when speaking to camera, that is. But when it comes to food, he's one of the two that are just quietly surviving. I put him below Tiffany simply because his dishes lately don't sound the least bit distinctive. He has talent, but he needs to start standing out. Like any of the MOTPers, I believe he can. It's just a question of will he or won't he until it's too late.
|
| 9 |
Alex |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
3
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
0
|
Alex seems to be one of the more controversial figures, and again, I understand why. He's one of the few chefs who has made a dish we can remember for cryin' out loud. But here's the thing. That was five episodes ago. The judges loved it! It was delicious, creative, distinctive, evocative of a very personal style... it was the perfect Top Chef dish! Alex demonstrated right out the gate that he can do it. And then he proceeded not to do it for ten straight challenges. If he were just making that dish now, if we'd gotten five episodes of mediocrity followed by that deconstructed borscht, we'd be calling it the same thing we call Stephen's curried apple and date pie: a fluke. Again, he's part of this exceptionally tight MOTP that might as well be 4a through 4e, as far as I'm concerned. But for him to get much higher, he's going to have to show that he didn't run out of bullets in the very first episode.
|
| 10 |
Amanda |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
2
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
2
|
2
|
Amanda, in many ways, is a lot like Kevin. Big highs, big lows, big potential, big inconsistency. So why is he at five and she at ten? Gut. Really, that's pretty much it. Both could easily bust out a great dish and win this week. Both could just as easily bomb and pack their knives. But Kevin seems to be getting his act together while Amanda shows no signs of doing so. And that's all the difference in this field. If I have to guess, I say Amanda hangs around two or three more episodes, busts out one of the best dishes of the competition, and promptly botches her next dish and goes home. Any success, I suspect, will be fleeting.
|
| 11 |
Stephen |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
3
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
2
|
With every passing week, I'm not sure if Stephen's survival is making my number two preseason pick look better because he's inching closer to that mark by attrition, or if he's making it look worse because we all get to watch how bad that pick was for another week. Poor guy. Almost as painful as watching him being eviscerated week in and week out is the look on his face that says he's mentally slapping his palm to his forehead and thinking, "Stupid, stupid, stupid!" It's like he's cursed with the ability to see his failings with perfect clarity, only after he's made them. Every challenge, it's "My dish rocks!!! ... What?!? ... Oh, man, you're right!" as he stands there, completely crestfallen. Never have I found the chronically about to be eliminated so pitiable and sympathetic. But we all know it's just a matter of time.
|
| 12 |
Tamesha |
|
Quickfires |
1
|
2
|
0
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
0
|
1
|
Y'know, that rhubarb scallop dish looks really interesting. And I can see how it might work. I'm betting there's a good dish in there. But there doesn't seem much question that it didn't come out on this particular occasion. I feel like Tamesha's no great loss. She put out some interesting stuff, and that will be missed, but she just never gave me the sense that she was going deep. Might as well cut her loose now and let the others fight it out.
|
| 13 |
Timothy |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
1
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
2
|
Timothy's Top Chef legacy ends up sounding a lot like his reputation back in Baltimore. He never quite lived up to expectations. And when the DC/Maryland boy can't bring home at least a top mention in the blue crab challenge, you know it's all over.
|
| 14 |
Arnold |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
0
|
1
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
1
|
2
|
1
|
With his elimination now a couple of weeks in the rearview mirror, it really is a shame that Arnold bit it when he did. If nothing else, he brought some interest to the proceedings. The guy's dishes were unquestionably distinctive, and sort of an odd, wilder and less refined counterpoint to Angelo's creative Asian. But I think the most we could have expected from him would have been a spoiler for the finals, so I'm not overly sad to see him go. Or maybe, like me, he didn't want to live in a world where squid ink pasta is a wacky and challenging menu item that will scare people off. Goodbye, cruel world.
|
| 15 |
Lynne |
|
Quickfires |
0
|
1
|
1
|
| Last Week: -- |
|
Eliminations |
0
|
1
|
1
|
I've been wanting to get this off my chest for over two weeks now, but though she deserved to go, I feel compelled to back Lynne up on one item. Dropping fresh pasta twelve minutes out IS crazy. One minute is hyperbole (unless it's really thin fresh pasta), but it's a very, very short cooking time, and to cook, sauce and plate eight(?) servings of pasta shouldn't take more than five minutes. That leaves it sitting there languishing for seven, which is waaaaaaaaaaay too long. No one disputes that Lynne undercooked the pasta, herself included (even if the show edit kind of made it seem that way). But that was an error that was independent of her call not to start cooking it so far away from the buzzer. I'm saying that by waiting to drop the pasta, she was right and Arnold was wrong... and THEN she blew it.
|
So there it is! More of a State of the Union than the typical hyper-obsessive analysis, but we'll try to get back to the latter this coming week now that things are mostly back to normal for us over here. I have a hunch this season is going to start looking up shortly. Hope I'm right.
WARNING : MINOR EPISODE SEVEN SPOILERS AHEAD
Every time I watch a clip on Hulu and hear the official ad pronounce Buitoni as "byoo-toni" I want to stick a fork in my eye. Why I care about how packaged "fresh" pasta is sold, I don't know. But if you're going to play the snooty Italian card, at least pronounce the name the way an Italian would.
That notwithstanding, I'm actually really looking forward to this episode. The quickfire is essentially an amuse bouche challenge that's structured in such a way that the chefs will be forced to keep their dishes to one bite. I love it. See who can pack the flavor in there. And for the elimination, an actual restaurant challenge, the exact nature of which remains a mystery. They're really cooking, folks, and it looks like they're cooking their own dishes. I suspect this'll be a good one.
Discuss!